Print Close
Print Close

CISG-online 2900
Jurisdiction Germany
Tribunal Oberlandesgericht München
Claimant Seller
Respondent Buyer
Date of decision 16-Aug-2017
Case no./Docket no. 34 SchH 14/16
Seller's country Germany
Buyer's country Spain
Goods involved Organic spelt kernels (Biodinkelkerne)
Application of the CISG Yes, Art. 1(1)(a)
Key CISG provisions cited and discussed Art. 8(1); Art. 8(2); Art. 14
CISG provisions also cited Art. 7; Art. 9(2)
CISG provisions discussed, but not in fact cited Art. 4
Decision published in Zeitschrift für Vertriebsrecht (ZVertriebsR) 2017, 371; Internationales Handelsrecht (IHR) 2018, 12-17
CLOUT no. 0
Pace database (translation generally available)
Other translations
Case history Schiedsgericht der Produktenbörse Würzburg, Arbitration No. B 243/16
present decision (confirming the admissibility of the ongoing arbitration)

Text of decision Click here
Comments on decision This decision was rendered upon an application to the court to determine whether an arbitration that had been commenced was admissible. The underlying dispute arose from a CISG contract. The court applied Article 8 of the CISG in interpreting the arbitration clause contained in the sales contract ('Arbitration of the seller').

Improvements, comments etc. - click here
Improvements, comments etc. for CISG-online no.: 2900

Email address If there is anything incorrect on this page or you have any improvements for it please report it with this formular.
Improvements, mistakes
Please enter the result of
the addition in the image below: